Tech companies operating in Vietnam are urged to uphold global human rights standards and to protect the rights of their users amid the continuing state-backed restriction of free speech in the country.
The Vietnamese government has long censored criticism and silenced dissenters — particularly those in online spaces. As Human Rights Watch (HRW) notes, “Political dissidents and human rights activists face systematic harassment, intimidation, arbitrary arrest, abuses in custody, and imprisonment.”
Now, international tech companies are being caught in the middle, forced to choose between assisting government censorship or upholding basic digital and human rights.
A report by Legal Initiatives for Vietnam evaluated the response of tech companies such as Meta/Facebook, Google, Netflix, TikTok, and Apple to the Vietnamese government’s requests for content moderation and access to users’ data. While the tech companies largely refused the government’s requests to access users’ data, Legal Initiatives for Vietnam found a 90 percent compliance rate in requests for content moderation.
The report flagged the censorship of government criticism.
Our findings show a concerning situation where these companies almost always comply with an increasing number of content moderation requests from the Vietnamese government, with the compliance rate consistently above 90 percent over the years, including geographical restrictions and content removals. At the same time, the government and some tech companies acknowledge that a significant portion of the restricted or removed content is government criticism, which is protected speech under international human rights law.
Meta, specifically, maintains a secret list of officials who cannot be criticized on Facebook, according to Legal Initiatives for Vietnam’s reporting. This was reiterated in a separate report by human rights watchdog Viet Tan which revealed that over 100 pieces of their content were blocked in Vietnam when Vietnamese politician To Lam, currently the general secretary of the Communist Party of Vietnam, visited the United States in September.
It asked Meta to consider the following in addressing the Vietnamese people’s right to information:
Since the Vietnamese government considers all content by activists’ groups as ‘sensitive’ and potentially violating local law, Meta needs to better articulate how it determines when content should be censored for local users. For example, will an informal request from Vietnam’s Ministry of Information and Communications be sufficient? Or should the request also be accompanied by a court order? And what if the underlying content merely expresses a widely held political opinion?
This is not the first time that Viet Tan has called out Meta for complying with “unjust and arbitrary” government requests. In an e-mail interview with this author, Viet Tan’s advocacy director, Michel Tran Duc, shares their plan for holding the company accountable in the United States.
We have raised Meta’s content takedown and restrictions, urging the company to be transparent about their process for blocking content at the request of the government. The next step is to involve members of Congress to hold Meta accountable for their collaboration with the Vietnamese government to censor free speech, and continue to raise awareness through reports of censorship actions that counter Meta’s commitment to its Corporate Human Rights Policy and membership in the Global Network Initiative.
Asked if the selection of a new president would lead to reforms, Michel Tran Duc highlighted the notorious human rights record of the country’s top officials.
The former was a police general, and the current one is an army general. There is no sign that human rights and freedom of the press will be better respected in Vietnam after the change in office. Only domestic and international pressure can advance these rights in Vietnam.
For its part, Legal Initiatives for Vietnam recommended in its report that tech companies resist illegitimate government requests, protect user data, remove cyber troops and trolls that manipulate online discussion, and support the work of human rights defenders.
—
Previously Published on globalvoices.org with Creative Commons License
***
Does dating ever feel challenging, awkward or frustrating?
Turn Your Dating Life into a WOW! with our new classes and live coaching.
Click here for more info or to buy with special launch pricing!
***
On Substack? Follow us there for more great dating and relationships content.
Join The Good Men Project as a Premium Member today.
All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS. A $50 annual membership gives you an all access pass. You can be a part of every call, group, class and community. A $25 annual membership gives you access to one class, one Social Interest group and our online communities. A $12 annual membership gives you access to our Friday calls with the publisher, our online community.
Register New Account
Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.—
Photo Credit: A Facebook post which has a caption of “Secretary-President To on the tightrope” was censored in Vietnam. Source: Facebook post of Viet Tan, used with permission.
The post How Tech Companies Enable Censorship in Vietnam appeared first on The Good Men Project.